it's a blog, what the hell do you expect it to contain.....

6.25.2004

newsies!

Rumsfeld is such a dick. On an authorization form for US forces to use certain kinds of harsh interrogation techniques, including using dogs and making detainees stand for four consecutive hours, Rumsfeld wrote on the bottom, "However, I stand for 8-10 hours a day. Why is standing limited to 4 hours?" See the article here, download the memo in PDF format here.

In other news, Cheney dropped the "f-bomb" on the Senate floor. No one can remember exactly what he said, but they narrowed it down to "fuck off" or "go fuck yourself." I think this is hilarious. It's not a big deal, just funny.

In a press conference the other day, Bush pronounced the Abu-Ghraib prison "Abu-Gah-REFF." This has been in the news for over a month! Okay, you can't pronounce Nuclear. Fine. I think you're stupid, but it's a common mis-pronunciation and sounds similar to the actual word. But you're the freaking president! This almost caused your Secretary of Defense to resign. And you can't even come close to pronouncing it correctly? AAAAAHHHHH!

6.24.2004

google doesn't get context

those ads at the top of this page (powered by Google!) constantly advertise a certain political party that I do not belong to because I keep mentioning said political party in a derogatory manner on blog posts. Apparently, Google doesn't understand the context of such comments. So I need to start mentioning the Democratic Party more often to hopefully replace those ads with ones I'm more biased towards. Because the Democratic Party is the party I support (and by "support," I mean do nothing but vote for). Yes, the Democratic Party. The party of Democrats. Lots and lots of Democrats in the Democratic Party. Let's see...what else...did you know that my mom is a delegate to the Democratic Party's national convention in Boston? Well, an alternate to the Democratic Party's national convention in Boston. Still, she'll be there either way. Anyway, that's probably enough Democratic Party references for now. Will it be enough to get some ads on that banner? Well, now the waiting game begins................

oh, the waiting game sucks, let's play hungry hungry hippos!

if you ask a stupid question...

I was reading an article on the Justice Dept. torture memo in the Economist this week and came across an extremely interesting quote from Ruth Wedgewood, a law professor at Johns Hopkins (and generally a Bush supporter). In looking at the memo, she said, "Instead of looking at 'what is the law regarding torture?' it asks 'what can we do and remain within the law?' As a result, the memo either ignores or glides over American and international laws that ban or limit torture." This very articulately grasps the concept that I've been unsuccessfully trying to reach for some time. I don't believe that this administration deliberately tries to do illegal stuff and maliciously ignore laws and treaties. This outlook that Wedgewood pinpoints in the memo is one of the more serious problems with the Bush administration. Instead of looking for what the laws are, they ask, 'what can we get away with?' As Wedgewood notes, this inevitably leads to official reports that focus only on stuff that the president wants to know instead of the whole body of information that can help him make an informed decision.

This can be applied to other, non-legal, questions. For instance, WMD's. If the President asked for reports on how they could make a case for Iraq having WMD's that could endanger the U.S., he would get a report of all indications leading to that conclusion, but he would not receive the full body of information he needed to make an informed decision. Call me naive if you must, but I don't think Bush deliberately manipulated information. I just don't think he ever had the full body of information he needed as a president. And this comes from his management style. He asks what he can do and say within the law (or within the truth) and the reports he gets from his subordinates gloss over the other relevant information that may lead to opposite conclusions. I don't think Bush has been doing it on purpose, but he's created an army of "yes" men who inform him only of the information he wants to hear.

I know this isn't a revelation, but I think that most people assume Bush is deliberately intimidating subordinates into withholding information contrary to administration ideology. That would imply then, that Bush is aware of other contrary information and is willingly suppressing it. I don't think that's the case. I think this memo instead suggests that it is the questions Bush asks rather than the orders he gives that lead to only a partial body of evidence reaching the top levels. I think Bush ultimately believes almost everything he says. And I think that's much scarier than him being a liar.

searching for Bobby Bonds

What ever happened to the black baseball player? It seems like more and more, baseball is become a white-only game, as far as Americans go. There are of course oodles of Latin players all over the major leagues, but there are currently very few black players making an impact in the major leagues. Yes, two of the best players in the league are black, with Barry Bonds and Ken Griffey, Jr. But one must also take notice that Griffey has been playing for 16 years and Bonds for 18. So they don't really reflect the state of race in the game right now, they reflect what it was 15 years ago. Additionally, both of their fathers were legitimate Major League stars (Bobby Bonds and Ken Griffey, Sr.). They grew up around the game and were of at least middle class households (baseball players didn't begin to make obscene amounts of money until the 1980s). I'm not sure what happened, but at some point young black men started to either not play baseball or be discriminated against to a point that excluded them from Major League baseball. I made a list of young black players that I could think of that play in the majors right now. This isn't exhaustive, but it's almost all of the relevant ones. For these purposes, "young and black" means under 30, African-American (not Hispanic), born (or at least raised) in the United States. Here's what I came up with.



Dontrelle WillisC.C. SabathiaDaryle Ward
Vernon WellsTike RedmanDerrek Lee
Chone Figgins

Ward, Redman, and Figgins are role players that have gone in between the minors and majors their entire careers and won't really make much of an impact on any team. Sabathia and Willis are very young and both pretty good pitchers. Lee and Wells are both solid players, but Lee turns 29 this year and is thus pretty close to not being included in this list.

Once Griffey and Bonds retire, who is going to be left? How did we go from an era when Bob Gibson and Satchel Paige were two of the best pitchers in the league and Willie Mays and Hank Aaron were two of the best hitters of all time to an era when Derrek Lee and Vernon Wells are the best young black hitters in the league and Dontrelle Willis and C.C. Sabathia are the best black pitchers? I doubt that there is some systematic exclusion of black baseball players among MLB teams, but something is happening. Is it that more and more young black males are focusing on basketball or football instead of baseball? While that may be the case, I doubt that it is much different now than it was in the 80's. If you wanted to take a racist view of it, you could say that baseball is the sport that relies least on potential and most on solid performance over a span of years and that black men tend to not have the dedication or drive. But I think that's crap.

I don't think major league baseball will ever get to a point at which it is a black man's league, as the NBA currently is. If we're being perfectly honest, we all know that the average black man is more athletic than the average white man, which, in the top levels of sports, gives black men an advantage in basketball and certain "skills" positions in football (i.e. the ones that don't require you to just be fat - white people are pretty good at that). But baseball is a sport that doesn't reward pure, raw athleticism as much as football and basketball. Baseball requires specific skills that you have to work at constantly to maintain and that aren't natural to human movement. That's not to say that basketball and football don't require more than athleticism - they undoubtedly do. Baseball just requires more. And that sort of levels the playing field a bit.

But that doesn't resolve the issue of why there is a diminishing quantity of quality black professional baseball players. The fact is, I really don't know what the deal is. It probably has nothing to do with money. If someone is trying to decide between playing baseball or football or basketball, baseball will make them more money by far (there's no salary cap in baseball). Maybe it is that baseball has changed dramatically from a primarily urban game in the '50s and '60s that attracted many black players to a primarily suburban and rural game that attracts few black players while attracting more white players. I think that the best way to look at it is in comparison with Latin baseball players. Other than soccer, baseball is the biggest sport in much of Latin America. They grow up playing it and nothing else. If baseball requires so much dedication and practice to develop and maintain the skills needed to play at a high level, then those focusing on multiple sports will have a tougher time succeeding at baseball than at another sport. At UT recently, we saw both Ricky Williams and Cedric Benson try to play professional (minor league) baseball during the football offseason, and both did horribly at baseball. Former University of Michigan quarterback Drew Henson (who is white, for the record) left school to sign a huge contract with the New York Yankees. He floundered around in the minor leagues and never fulfilled expectations and recently came back to the NFL and is now with the Cowboys. So maybe, just maybe, black athletes at the highest level have multitudes of options and thus don't succeed as much at baseball as at football and basketball and, as a result, choose one of the other two. White athletes at the highest level often don't have the same elite ability at several sports and thus can focus specifically on baseball, developing those skills to an extent that a multi-sport athlete cannot. It's just a theory and might be way off, but I have nothing else.

6.23.2004

c'mon, who didn't see this coming?

"The Mormons are from Mars, Dad, we've had it checked." -Eddie Izzard, pretending to be Jesus, in his HBO stand-up special, Dress to Kill. Now, we mere mortals may have proof of just such a reality. According to the New York Times, these almost perfectly spherical stones found on Mars eerily resemble those that reside in Utah. Now, I can logically draw either of two conclusions from this: 1) the Mormons traveled west until they got to a point that closely resembled their homeland at which point they settled, or 2) the Mormons brought these rocks with them from Mars and disseminated them across their settlement to make it feel more "homey." Either way, I think we all know what we have to do.

6.22.2004

can I sign up for the human testing?

Google News links to an article with possibly the best title ever: Snorted Virus Dampens Rats' Cocaine High. I think this is the next stage in the War on Drugs.....in the rat community. Lacing cocaine supplies with this modified virus so that they snort it up with their cocaine is a sure-fire bet to lower cocaine consumption in rats, which is at dangerously high levels. And if there's one thing endangering this world right now, it's coked-up rats. Or was that 1987......

adspeak

I saw a Chevy Suburban ad yesterday that played up the fact that "before there were SUV's, there was the Suburban. For seventy years..." yadda yadda yadda. Then at the end, the voice-over said, "It's not every day you can own a legend." Now, if the implication is that the Suburban is the "legend" referenced in the ad, then isn't that the precise opposite of the ad's point? Isn't the point of the ad that you CAN own this legend every day and that to prove it you should buy one? Is this a one-time offer of Chevy Suburbans? Will the title of my car rotate to someone else every other day so that I don't own said legend every day? Shouldn't the ad say, "You can in fact own a legend every day, you gas-guzzling motherfucker!" God, I hate GM.

6.21.2004

the Economist must've sold my name...

Somehow I managed to get on a Republican National Committee mailing list as a loyal Republican. Don't ask me how; I have no idea. Anyway, the letter is pretty stupid (as I'm sure one from the DNC would be as well), but one thing struck me. The letter says:

In addition, President Bush has signed into law the most important education reform in a generation, transformed the federal government to protect our homeland, AND led our Nation courageously in the War on Terrorism.

But - despite these tremendous accomplishments - the fight for America's future is far from over.

In fact, the real battle is just beginning...

You see, the liberals are retrenching! And now, they're hungrier than ever to undermine President Bush, and his agenda for a better, more prosperous America. Just consider this quote from a prominent liberal activist:

"Now the President is out of control and threatens American democracy and the peace of the world...Bush must be beaten in 2004. Not only the nation, but the world depends on it."

First of all, that education reform is opposed by almost all teachers in the country; the department of homeland security was opposed by Bush at first and is still horribly underfunded and ineffective; and courageous leadership isn't necessarily good leadership. A lot of idiots are foolishly courageous. Furthermore, I'm glad to know they think we're retrenching. That means they're scared. But seriously, is that the most outrageous quote from a liberal activist you could come up with? That's downright rational. If that's the best they can do - if that's what's supposed to conjure up conservative anger - the Republican Party has serious problems. I'll give further updates on all RNC correspondence.